Trackbacks

• No trackbacks exist for this post.

Comments

• 01-30-2012 Steve Cooper wrote:
  Most Independents voted for Obama and they will not vote for Romney or Newt in 2012. Don't buy the media lies. These 'Independents' are closet Socialists that hide behind the "I" label. - Steve Cooper
  Reply to this
  1. 01-30-2012 Steve Cooper wrote:
     Need to do more meditation and Tai Chi, because working on The Conservative Monster is making my BP explode. I wouldn't even bother any longer at this point, but I get tons of emails from people that love the site. I keep it going for them. Throw the left wing vermin in Gitmo with the same terrorists that they defend and call it a day
     Reply to this
     1. 01-30-2012 AuntieMadder wrote:
        Your blog is useful for the past/archived blog posts alone. If it's not too much bother, just continue to throw a few sentences out here each day, as the mood strikes you, to keep the rigormortis from setting in. Should you one day decide you don't want to do it at all anymore, a little heads up would be appreciated. I'm surely not the only one who'd want the chance to copy some of the best chit here to the hard drive for future reference.
        Reply to this
        1. 01-30-2012 Steve Cooper wrote:
           I use the site just like Twitter sometimes. I post quotes and comments; that will continue. I took a break earlier in the year, but things got way too busy ...
           
           Reply to this
• 01-30-2012 JCooper wrote:
  Damn Steve,that's hard core.But I totally agree.I'm votin for Newt tomorrow morning,because I still can.As for these communist bastards,I'm about as ready as a person can be,I'm tired of playin their fuckin games.Seems they do everything sooo friggin slow.Like death by a 1000 cuts.Watch your BP and keep your head down.If you got to bug out,you know where to go.
  Reply to this
  1. 01-30-2012 Steve Cooper wrote:
     10-4 bro...I am like a cat with 9 lives
     
     Reply to this
• 01-30-2012 END the FED wrote:
  George Soros and Ron Paul ???? http://www.bluerepublican.org/about/
  This will blow you away .....
  
  
  http://theulstermanreport.com/2012/01/03/ron-paul-endorsed-by-progressive-blue-republican-organization/
  Reply to this
• 01-30-2012 END the FED wrote:
  Romney Judicial Record: Liberals Running Wild
  
  http://conservativebyte.com/2012/01/romney-judicial-record-liberals-running-wild/
  
  
  
  http://conservativebyte.com/2012/01/mitt-romney-and-charges-of-medicare-fraud/
  Reply to this
• 01-30-2012 teloscaylos wrote:
  Great commentary!
  
  Next time the GOP should simply tell us who the candidate will be. That way it will save time and won't have to carpet bomb the other candidates.
  
  Was it six or seven months ago that you said Romney would be shoved down our throat? Whatever it was, you were right. I have never seen such a carpet bombing of a candidate as that happening to Newt. In Florida, much of the AD time was purchased by Romney; Newt managed to eek out a radio ad, then Rubio was all over him.
  
  About the eligibility issue... Whatever Judge Malihi's ruling is, Georgia would will vote Republican anyway. So one state alone doesn't mean a lot. It has more to do with the eligibility domino effect, which in theory would lead to numerous eligibility trials across the country. However, since Mitt "medicare fraud" Romeny is the GOP choice, does the Obama issue really matter? I mean Romney is a guy when, under pressure of the moment, praised Hezbollah’s healthcare system...this guy has no moral compass.
  Reply to this
  1. 01-30-2012 END the FED wrote:
     How does the GOP battle against this Endorsement ????
     
     Obama will have a field day with this !!!!
     
     George Soros: There isn't a bit of Difference Between Romney And Obama
     
     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeDtzeKo-G8&feature=player_embedded
     
     for Romney to be taken serious he would have to say he will repeal Romneycare because its the same thing .
     But he won't , http://ricochet.com/main-feed/Norm-Coleman-We-re-Not-Going-to-Repeal-Obamacare
     
     a Heath care mandate on a state by state level of enforcement will not work because the balance of Retired versus working class would not be balanced in each state equally so it will never work . What we need is the freedom to access Health care and Insurance from wherever the best deal is .
     
     Allen West Being Redistricted Out by Romney Operative
     http://gulagbound.com/25658/allen-west-being-redistricted-out-by-romney-operative/
     Reply to this
  2. 01-30-2012 END the FED wrote:
     Mitt Romney Wants to Fund Obama Care!!!
     http://tinyurl.com/77ywwvu
     Reply to this
  3. 01-30-2012 Steve Cooper wrote:
     Good point about Ga voting Republican
     
     Reply to this
• 01-30-2012 END the FED wrote:
  THIS Comparisonof links ARE ALL YOU NEED TO SEE TO KNOW THERE IS A CONSPIRACY AT WORK TO DOMINATE POWER OVER THE PEOPLES VOTE !!!!!
  
  
  NEWT needs to say Romney Endorsed by Both Elite party establishments SOROS and BUSH http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/video/george-hw-bush-endorses-mitt-romney-15214784
  
  George Soros: There isn't a bit of Difference Between Romney And Obama
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeDtzeKo-G8&feature=player_embedded
  
  Newt is right elite conspiring to hold Control , Jeb & George HW Bush and Obama Jan.27,2012
  
  http://tinyurl.com/7jcu9cj
  Reply to this
• 01-30-2012 AuntieMadder wrote:
  Of the remaining candidates, I gotta' go with Ol' Newty. Mittens and Ron Paultard - well, you know why not either of them. I don't know much about Santorum and, based upon what little I've heard/read from/about him, he seems okay. But with his daughter, Bella, currently battling for her little life, I don't imagine he can dedicate himself - time, emotion, focus, everything - on this campaign, which is what it will take to wrest the nomination away from the already-selected Mittens. And, frankly, I'll come to dislike Santorum if he proves me wrong and throws himself - all of himself - into his campaign(s). He's young and there are many campaigns and elected positions ahead of him...but he's only got one little Bella. A man who doesn't love his baby girl that much sure as hell can't care about hundreds of millions of us Americans who he's never laid eyes upon. 'Nuff said.
  
  So, I can say "President Gingrich" without wanting to spit or vomit. (I can not say "President O-...President O-...President Obaaa-..." [spits] "President Barky O'Blowme" is the best I can do.) What I can't and won't be able to stomach is canonization of the man. No Saint Gingrich. No Gingrich the Messiah. No going all gushy and poetic about Gingrich: the pillor of honor and integrity, the shining beacon of kindness and warmth, or any other assignment of virtues that the man shows no indications of possessing, at least not in any remarkable or significant quantities.
  
  As Pamela Gellar wrote about him, "Newt may be an SOB, but he’s our SOB. And we need an SOB to defeat the snake in the White House."
  http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/gingrich-the-sob-we-need/
  
  PS: I suggest Gingrich's campaign song be Nazareth's "Now You're Messing With A Son Of A Bitch." It just now came to me and it seems so perfect. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RFeIj-xwEM&feature=player_embedded#!
  Reply to this
  1. 01-30-2012 END the FED wrote:
     I am that old to know that Song !!!!!!
     
     Hey Mitt says here in this video He will Cut military spending and Fund Obamacare , http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2U7V4cav6-8&feature=player_embedded
     Reply to this
  2. 01-31-2012 Steve Cooper wrote:
     Romney will be anointed, but I love pushing Newt to drive the Libertarian insurgents crazy.
     
     Reply to this
• 01-31-2012 AuntieMadder wrote:
  There are things I like about ‘Ol Newty, but his closeted support of nationalized health care ain’t one of them. There’s no getting around this fact, even if he continues to get around talking about it, at least in conservative circles/arenas and until after Nov 2012.
  
  We've been screwed yet again by the elitists of both parties, the top tier of Republican muckity mucks, and the lamestream media. They'll get their nationalized health care, GE will get their return on their Healthymagination product R&D investment, and the march towards a EU-like socialist US will continue forward without halting or hesitation. And it won't matter who wins the GOP nomination or the election for president: Mittens, Ol Newty or Barky.
  
  http://bungalowbillscw.blogspot.com/2011/11/newt-gingrich-fannie-freddie-and.html
  Note: The blogger, Bungalow Bill, wrote that Healthymagination was launched when Barky’s health scare bill was passed. I think that is incorrect, that GE’s Healthymagination was launched prior to the signing of the bill. In fact, billions of dollars had already been poured into the product at that time, indicating that GE already knew a couple of years in advance of the bill being signed or even (supposedly) written that a health scare bill/law was going to happen, that it was a sure thing.
  
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  
  http://video.msnbc.msn.com/meet-the-press/43038193#43038193
  
  REP. GINGRICH: I am for people, individuals — exactly like automobile insurance — individuals having health insurance and being required to have health insurance . And I am prepared to vote for a voucher system which will give individuals, on a sliding scale, a government subsidy so we insure that everyone as individuals have health insurance .
  
  MR. GREGORY: What you advocate there is precisely what President Obama did with his healthcare legislation, is it not?
  
  REP. GINGRICH: No, it’s not precisely what he did. In, in the first place , Obama basically is trying to replace the entire insurance system, creating state exchanges, building a Washington – based model, creating a federal system . I believe all of us — and this is going to be a big debate — I believe all of us have a responsibility to help pay for health care . I think the idea that…
  
  MR. GREGORY: You agree with Mitt Romney on this point.
  
  REP. GINGRICH: Well, I agree that all of us have a responsibility to pay — help pay for health care . And, and I think that there are ways to do it that make most libertarians relatively happy. I’ve said consistently we ought to have some requirement that you either have health insurance or you post a bond…
  
  MR. GREGORY: Mm-hmm.
  
  REP. GINGRICH: …or in some way you indicate you’re going to be held accountable.
  
  MR. GREGORY: But that is the individual mandate, is it not?
  
  REP. GINGRICH: It’s a variation on it.
  Reply to this
  1. 01-31-2012 END the FED wrote:
     What I don't get is why Santorum has not caught any traction , he is about the most conservative but yet everyone shys away , and if its about not being able to take it to Obama while they pick MITT and NEWT tell me that everyone voting is wanting to cut spending and cut big Government but their part of the package and thats going to be our downfall the crash thats coming because of this lack of will on the part of the Public to really vote for a Cutter of Government spending will mean we get a Cut from a economic crash that cannot be baled out like before .
     
     So if we Know the BIG BUST is coming with no way out , which all you have to do is add up the fact that No One even taxing the rich 100 % will pay off the debt in any reasonable time that allows for the free market to continue , then this is why the RINO and Commy Left are basically a Plutocracy that are Conspiring to slowly collape the Free markets like is happening .
     Lets analize the signs of such a Conspiracy as we watch the Theater of politics Play out ;
     Romney Endorsed by Both Elite party establishments SOROS and BUSH,
     http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/video/george-hw-bush-endorses-mitt-romney-15214784
     George Soros: There isn't a bit of Difference Between Romney And Obama
     
     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeDtzeKo-G8&feature=player_embedded
     Plutocracy elite conspiring to hold Control , Jeb & George HW Bush and Obama Jan.27,2012 I pulled this Photo off Free Republic
     
     http://tinyurl.com/7jcu9cj
     Reply to this
     1. 01-31-2012 END the FED wrote:
        Too go with STEVES link to the Attack on Capitalism yesterday , here is More Proof that the Plutocracy is at work Consolidating and Confiscating FREE market wealth All over the world in this Final Episode of Free market Economics ;
        MF Global and the lie about safe accounts
        Commentary: Why the brokerage industry should be worried
        
        http://www.marketwatch.com/Story/story/print?guid=B05A7606-4B59-11E1-803F-002128040CF6
        Reply to this
     2. 01-31-2012 AuntieMadder wrote:
        Santorum hasn't caught any traction for the same reason that Bachmann didn't: the lamestream media has marginalized him. Like Bachmann, Perry, Ryan and Cain* before him, the media has mostly ignored him, denying him the free publicity they've consistently and constantly heaped upon Mittens and Ol Newty. When they do mention Santorum, they word those mentions to imply or sometimes even state outright that Santorum is small potatoes and doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell. Believing what's been reported to them as news, primaries voters, not wanting to "waste" their votes, select from those the news reporters report to be stronger candidates, more likely to win or at least have a shot at winning the state.
        
        The primaries should be the time for voters to go for it! - waste their votes! - make a statement and maybe even give the small dog a chance to become pack leader. But state primaries rules, such as voters being allowed to vote in the primaries of the party(s) to which they aren't registered, for example, have totally f*cked that up. Intentional f*ck ups made by those who wrote those rules, no doubt, to make sure only those wel-monied and/or backed completely by the GOP or DNC will become the nominees. Then there's this BS of the primaries voters in the first three states, Iowa, NH and one of the Carolinas, selecting the winners for all 50 states.
        
        By the way, Santorum's Iowa win initially being reported as Mittens' win put the hurt on Santorum's campaign big time. The voters in the next state (NH?) who would have voted for Santorum if they thought he stood a chance of wnning their state, not wanting to "waste" their vote on him and thus give their state to Mittens or Ol Newty, whichever of the two they felt more strongly against, voted for the lesser of the two evils (Mittens or Newty). Many who had favored Santorum didn't vote for him, but voted for Mittens or Newty instead, because of the initial reports that stated without question or doubt that Romney had won Iowa. I will never be convinced that the reporting of supposed miscounted tallies wasn't another planned f*ck up. And because polls are nothing more than other sets of numbers/tallies that can be miscounted or the counts be misreported (more planned f*ck ups that happen often), we'll never know if Santorum would have won the second primaried state (NH, right?).
        
        *That is, at least until Cain's campaign started looking like it was going to burn some rubber (still riding out your gaining traction metaphor...ha! did ir again) without the media's help, so they took more drastic measures to reign him back in: they showed him and the rest of the candidates what it can be like when the media stops ignoring you and sets its sights on you, instead. :o Scary chit.
        Reply to this
        1. 01-31-2012 END the FED wrote:
           @RickSantorum @ReaganWorld @newtgingrich need to consolidate your Missions please dear God give them WISDOM !!!!!!!!!!
           Reply to this
  2. 01-31-2012 AuntieMadder wrote:
     A bio of ‘Ol Newty at KPMG Institutes puts a positive spin on Gingrich’s promotion of socialized – uh, I mean nationalized – health care.
     
     “Widely recognized for his commitment to a better system of health for all Americans, his leadership helped save Medicare from bankruptcy, prompted FDA reform to help the seriously ill and initiated a new focus on research, prevention, and wellness. His contributions have been so great that the American Diabetes Association awarded him their highest non-medical award and the March of Dimes named him their 1995 Citizen of the Year. Today he serves as a board member of the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation.
     
     In his book, Saving Lives and Saving Money, Gingrich describes his vision of a 21st Century System of Health and Healthcare that is centered on the individual, prevention focused, knowledge intense and innovation rich. Moreover, he makes the case for a marketmediated system that will improve choice and quality while driving down costs. To foster such a modern health system that provides better outcomes at lower cost, Gingrich launched the Center for Health Transformation (www.healthtransformation.net). He also joined Tom Daschle and Bill Frist as board members of GE’s $6 billion Healthymagination initiative. A key component is the investment of $3 billion in R&D over the next six years in a specific portfolio of more than 100 innovations designed to lower costs and improve healthcare access and quality.
     
     Gingrich also serves with former Senator Bob Kerrey as co-chairman of the National Commission for Quality Long-term Care. The commission will make recommendations to policymakers and the public on how to transform healthcare services for the frail elderly and disabled in order to maximize independence and achieve a high quality of life and quality of care for our aging population.”
     
     http://www.kpmginstitutes.com/events/speakers/newt-gingrich.aspx
     
     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     
     GE a corporate sponsor - Washington Times
     http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/11/ge-corporate-sponsor/
     
     Gingrich Backs Obamacare's Individual Mandate Requiring Health Insurance
     http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/gingrich-health-care-insurance/2011/05/15/id/396426
     
     The Gingriches: Members of the American Aristocracy?
     http://www.newsmax.com/Insiders/JackieGingrich/bio-96
     
     Newt Gingrich Co-Sponsored the 1987 Pro-Fairness Doctrine Bill
     http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2011/04/29/newt-gingrich-co-sponsored-the-1987-pro-fairness-doctrine-bill/
     
     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     
     At the link below is quite a laundry list of alleged anti-conservative, anti-America/American deeds and words. I say "alleged" because, without hundreds of hours of research and verification/confirmation, I honestly don't know. Maybe you guys can take a look at it and see if you spot any lies or BS right off. Your efforts will be appreciated.
     http://www.westernjournalism.com/is-newt-gingrich-a-conservative-you-decide/
     Reply to this
     1. 01-31-2012 END the FED wrote:
        Obama is going to win man ........
        
        
        Obama will win with this Guy as the Republican Nominee , and BUSH endorsed him ?????
        
        they want Obama to win , either they have more power with Obama in or its all just a Big theater joke .
        
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vS9SF3vc-A&feature=player_embedded
        Reply to this
• 01-31-2012 AuntieMadder wrote:
  Now, look at this chit. The national party committees want to maintain control of the primaries. They must control the state primaries in order to select the nominee. If the primaries season runs too long and if too many of the states' primaries are watched and even studied by primaries voters nationwide, maintaining that kind of control over the outcome while simultaneously putting on political theater for the voters becomes too big a job, too unwieldy and too difficult...and the risk of being found out grows to large. That's why they like to put on the show in those first three or four states then have the other 47 or 46 running their primaries back-to-back, sometimes seeming to even overlap each others' voting commencement date and poll closing dates. The numbers come in so fast, counties only know what's going on in their own county, forget knowing how the counts are coming along in other states! Flat, undetailed reports of winners and losers from each state make the nightly and cable news and then bippity boppity boom! it's a done deal and the nomination has been made. It's kinda' like the ol' two-person shoplifting team: one distracts the clerk while the other stuffs everything in sight into his/her pockets, but on a much grander scale and what they loot is priceless. The crooked SOBs...
  http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2011/10/gop_primaries_how_early_can_they_go_.html
  Reply to this
• 01-31-2012 AuntieMadder wrote:
  END the FED, Steve Cooper, and anyone else reading this, pardon my colorful language this morning. As my granddad used to say, I'm madder than two hornets right now. Learning more of Newty's track record (even if only part of that laundry list, for example, is factual, that's still a lot of crooked, libtarded and progressive chit that man's done), it's hit me like a ton of bricks this morning that Newty, like Mittens, has been selected by the GOP. It's political theatre. They've pit a progressive libtarded sack of chit who sports an "R" after his name against a progressive libtarded sack of chit who sports an "R" after his name and call it the battle to prove who's the real conservative. Each accuses the media and the party of favoring the other. Each slings chit at the other like the apes in cages that they are and complains to the news reporters that they claim ignore them in favor of the other guy that the other guy keeps throwing chit at him.
  
  At the end of the Battle To Be The Real Conservative, aka the Republican primaries, the last one standing will be declared the Real Conservative and GOP nominee. He will then move on to battle the sitting progressive libtarded sack of chit in the Battle To Prove Who Loves and Is Loved By America Most. Each will accuse the media and the big-monied backing elitists of favoring the other. Each will sling chit at the other...
  
  At the end of the contest, the last progressive libtarded sack of chit standing is declared President of the United States of America and goes on to sling his chit all over DC, the country and, on special occasions, the entire world.
  
  It's 2008 all over again except, to shake things up a bit and keep the entire country from having a bad feeling of deja vu, they've selected two, either of which they'll be okay with in the end. They're letting us play Election, like children playing Cowboys and Indians.
  
  I wish I didn't see through the chit because it's really got me p*ssed off.
  Reply to this
• 01-31-2012 END the FED wrote:
  This confirms what Steve has been saying about the War against capitalism , What this story shows us is the transformation to a International Plutocracy , but the Fight now is between the Powers that want Full Control over everyone and everything versus the Factions that want to control the wealth of Resources that creates the structure that separates the Marxists from full control , this is the War we see playing out today . A Gingrich Santorum Administration would be yet a 3rd rail in this division of Power over what provides Liberty to Individuals .
  
  http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig10/mishin1.html
  
  http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/pravda.asp
  Reply to this
• 01-31-2012 AuntieMadder wrote:
  I'd almost decided to blow off voting in the primaries and election this year, turn off the cable news and stay off the blogs until after the first week of Nov since it won't make a chit which progressive libtarded selection moves into the White House next. Then I remembered how badly the sound of Barky's voice grates against my nerves. So, I'll vote for his GOP opponent this Nov just to get that jackass off of my tv screen and his voice out of my home for good.
  Reply to this
  1. 01-31-2012 END the FED wrote:
     do you consider that we might be under dictatorship before then ?
     Reply to this
• 02-01-2012 Steve Cooper wrote:
  Not one person I know likes Romney, but he seems to get all of the votes and is leading in the polls? This is your wake up call to see that the system has been corrupted. You don't need an "Internet link" to tell you this. It is called common sense. Try it... -Steve Cooper
  Reply to this

Leave a comment